CLASS OVERVIEW

Take a quiz to decide which path you would take in the struggle for Civil Rights and listen to the following discussion. Learn about William Monroe Trotter.

BEFORE YOU GET STARTED:

• Please check the materials that go with this lesson and print relevant materials.
• Also, check out the books and products the teachers use for further learning.
• Reach out to support@urbanintellectuals.com if you have any questions or issues.
• Some links may be affiliate links where we may earn a small commission from purchases.

Sources:

N/A

William Monroe Trotter was born on **April 7, 1872**, in **Chillicothe, Ohio** “1”). He was the **third child** of **James Monroe Trotter** and **Virginia Isaacs Trotter**, but the first to survive infancy. His father, James, was born into slavery in Mississippi but was later freed and became a **lieutenant in the 55th Regiment of the Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry (Colored)** during the Civil War.

Trotter grew up in **Hyde Park, Massachusetts**, in a well-to-do family that emphasized education and activism. He excelled academically, becoming **valedictorian** of his high school class and later attending **Harvard University**, where he was the **first African American to earn a Phi Beta Kappa key**. His upbringing instilled in him a strong sense of duty to fight racial discrimination, which shaped his later activism.

William Monroe Trotter’s early life was shaped by several key influences:

– **His Parents’ Activism**: His father, **James Monroe Trotter**, was born into slavery but later became a **Union Army officer** and a **Recorder of Deeds** in Washington, D.C. His mother, **Virginia Isaacs Trotter**, was also deeply involved in the fight against racial discrimination. Their commitment to civil rights instilled in Trotter a strong sense of purpose.

– **Education and Excellence**: Trotter attended **Harvard University**, where he became the **first African American to earn a Phi Beta Kappa key**. His academic success reinforced his belief in the power of education as a tool for racial uplift.

– **Exposure to Racial Inequality**: Growing up in **Hyde Park, Massachusetts**, he witnessed both the privileges of his middle-class upbringing and the persistent racial barriers that African Americans faced. This dual perspective fueled his determination to challenge segregation and discrimination.

– **Influence of W.E.B. Du Bois**: Trotter was a contemporary of **W.E.B. Du Bois**, and their shared commitment to civil rights led to the formation of the **Niagara Movement**, a precursor to the NAACP. However, Trotter often took a more radical stance than Du Bois, advocating for direct action against racial injustice.

His upbringing and experiences laid the foundation for his later activism.  

William Monroe Trotter challenged Booker T. Washington’s accommodationist approach because he believed it compromised the fight for full civil rights. Washington advocated for economic progress and vocational training for Black Americans while avoiding direct confrontation with white supremacy. Trotter, however, saw this as accepting second-class citizenship and argued that Black Americans should demand immediate equality rather than settling for gradual change.

Trotter used his newspaper, The Guardian, to criticize Washington’s influence, accusing him of silencing dissent and controlling Black leadership through financial and political connections. He also helped form the Niagara Movement, which later influenced the NAACP, to push for direct action against racial injustice.

His opposition to Washington was bold and uncompromising, making him a key figure in the early civil rights movement. 

Woodrow Wilson agreed to meet with **William Monroe Trotter** because Trotter was a prominent civil rights activist and journalist who had supported Wilson’s presidential campaign in **1912**. Trotter believed Wilson would uphold his promises of fair treatment for Black Americans, but when Wilson’s administration **expanded segregation in federal offices**, Trotter sought a meeting to challenge these policies.

Trotter met with Wilson **twice**, in **1913 and 1914**, as a representative of the **National Independent Political League**. He hoped to persuade Wilson to reverse segregation policies, arguing that Black and white clerks had worked together for decades without issue. 

William Monroe Trotter met with President Woodrow Wilson in 1914 to protest Wilson’s support for segregation of Black federal employees. Trotter, representing the National Independent Political League, confronted Wilson directly at the White House, arguing that segregation was unjust and unnecessary since Black and white clerks had worked together for decades without issue.

During the meeting, Trotter boldly challenged Wilson, questioning his integrity and demanding action. Wilson, offended by Trotter’s direct approach, had him removed from the White House. Despite this, Trotter took his case to the press, publicly criticizing Wilson’s policies and exposing the administration’s role in expanding segregation.

His confrontation with Wilson was a defining moment in early civil rights activism, demonstrating the power of direct action and fearless advocacy In exposing the administration’s role in reinforcing segregation. His bold activism became a model for later civil rights movements.

William Monroe Trotter was a **trailblazing civil rights activist and journalist** who fought tirelessly for racial equality in the early 20th century. Here are some of his major accomplishments:

– **Founded The Guardian (1901)**: He established this influential African American newspaper to challenge racial injustice and oppose Booker T. Washington’s accommodationist policies.

– **Co-founded the Niagara Movement (1905)**: Alongside W.E.B. Du Bois, he helped create this precursor to the NAACP, advocating for full civil rights for Black Americans.

– **Challenged President Woodrow Wilson (1914)**: He confronted Wilson over the introduction of segregation in federal workplaces, making national headlines

– **Protested The Birth of a Nation (1915)**: He led efforts to ban screenings of the racist film, though he was only partially successful.

– **Advocated for Black representation at the Paris Peace Conference (1919)**: Despite opposition from the U.S. government, he attended as a delegate of the National Equal Rights League.

Trotter’s **unwavering activism** made him a key figure in the fight for racial justice, even when his methods were controversial. His legacy continues to inspire civil rights movements today.

William Monroe Trotter passed away on **April 7, 1934**, which was also his **62nd birthday**. His death was the result of a **fall from the roof of his home in Boston**. While the exact circumstances remain uncertain, it is known that he was experiencing **depression and personal struggles** at the time. His legacy as a **civil rights activist and journalist** continues to be recognized today.

If you were in the Civil Rights time,  would you be with the Non-violence of the Civil Rights leadership or with the Deacons of Defense and Justice and the Black Panthers and Why?

CLASS OVERVIEW

Learn about the Deacons of Defense and Justice and how they compared to other groups.

BEFORE YOU GET STARTED:

• Please check the materials that go with this lesson and print relevant materials.
• Also, check out the books and products the teachers use for further learning.
• Reach out to support@urbanintellectuals.com if you have any questions or issues.
• Some links may be affiliate links where we may earn a small commission from purchases.

Sources:

 N/A

The **Deacons for Defense and Justice**, an armed African-American self-defense group founded in 1964. They emerged during the civil rights movement to protect activists from violent white supremacist groups like the Ku Klux Klan.

The Deacons were formed in Jonesboro, Louisiana, by **Earnest “Chilly Willy” Thomas** and **Frederick Douglass Kirkpatrick*. They played a crucial role in safeguarding civil rights workers, particularly members of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), who faced relentless threats and attacks. Their presence challenged the myth that the civil rights movement was entirely nonviolent—many activists saw armed self-defense as a necessary response to the dangers they faced.

One of their most notable chapters was in **Bogalusa, Louisiana**, where they actively defended Black citizens and civil rights activists against Klan violence. Their efforts helped push federal authorities to enforce civil rights laws more aggressively.

It’s a fascinating and often overlooked part of history. 

The U.S. government had a complex response to the **Deacons for Defense and Justice**, as their armed self-defense approach challenged the traditional nonviolent civil rights movement.

*Government Response**

– **Federal Intervention** – The Deacons’ presence forced federal authorities to take civil rights violations more seriously. Their actions in **Bogalusa, Louisiana** pressured the government to intervene against Ku Klux Klan violence – **FBI Surveillance** – The **Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)** monitored the Deacons closely, concerned about their armed resistance. However, their focus soon shifted to larger Black Power organizations like the **Black Panther Party **Local Law Enforcement Resistance** – Many local police departments were hostile toward the Deacons, often siding with white supremacist groups. In some cases, police refused to protect Black activists, making the Deacons’ armed presence even more necessary.

– **Civil Rights Movement Tensions** – Traditional civil rights leaders, including **Martin Luther King Jr.**, were cautious about endorsing the Deacons’ tactics. While some activists supported their approach, others feared it would escalate violence. Despite government scrutiny, the Deacons played a crucial role in protecting activists and shifting the civil rights movement’s strategy. Their influence helped pave the way for later self-defense organizations.

The **Deacons for Defense and Justice** and the **Black Panther Party** both embraced armed self-defense, but their strategies and objectives differed significantly.

### **Key Differences**

– **Origins & Focus**:

  – The **Deacons** formed in 1964 in Louisiana to protect civil rights activists from Klan violence.

  – The **Black Panther Party** (BPP) was founded in 1966 in Oakland, California, with a broader mission of community empowerment and resistance against police brutality.

– **Tactics**:

  – The **Deacons** primarily focused on **defensive protection**, ensuring activists could safely protest and register voters.

  – The **BPP** took a more **proactive approach**, openly patrolling Black neighborhoods and confronting police misconduct.

– **Community Programs**:

  – The **Deacons** were mainly a security force.

  – The **BPP** launched **social programs**, including free breakfast for children, medical clinics, and education initiatives.

### **Similarities**

– Both groups **challenged nonviolent resistance**, arguing that self-defense was necessary.

– Both faced **government surveillance and repression**, including FBI investigations.

– Both inspired later movements advocating for Black self-determination.

The **Deacons laid the groundwork** for armed resistance, while the **Black Panther Party expanded the movement** into broader political and social activism. 

The **Deacons for Defense and Justice** were a Black self-defense organization founded in **1964** in **Jonesboro, Louisiana** to protect civil rights activists from violent white supremacist groups like the Klu Klux Klan.

### **Key Members**

Some of the notable figures in the organization included:

– **Earnest “Chilly Willy” Thomas** – Co-founder

– **Frederick Douglas Kirkpatrick** – Co-founder

– **Charles Sims** – Leader of the Bogalusa chapter
– **A.Z. Young** – Key figure in Bogalusa
– **Robert Hicks** – Leader in Bogalusa, Louisiana

### **Impact**

The Deacons played a crucial role in shifting the civil rights movement’s approach to self-defense. Their armed presence:

– **Protected civil rights activists** from Klan violence

– **Forced federal intervention** in areas where local law enforcement failed to protect Black citizens.

– **Helped neutralize Klan intimidation** in Louisiana and beyond

– **Provided security** for major civil rights events, including the **1966 March Against Fear** from Memphis to Jackson, Mississippi

### **Notable Events**

– **Bogalusa Confrontations (1965)** – The Deacons clashed with the Klan, leading to national attention and federal intervention

– **March Against Fear (1966)** – They provided armed protection for activists marching from Memphis to Jackson
– **Jonesboro Defense Efforts (1964-1965)** – They successfully deterred Klan violence in their hometown

Their influence declined by **1968**, as Black political participation increased and the Black Power movement gained momentum. However, their legacy remains a powerful testament to the necessity of self-defense in the fight for civil rights.

Name the person and the strategies they used that you thought was impressive or stacked to your memory.

CLASS OVERVIEW

Learn about what strategies other Kings and Queens used to defeat their oppressors. Learn about The Deacons of Defense and Justice.

BEFORE YOU GET STARTED:

• Please check the materials that go with this lesson and print relevant materials.
• Also, check out the books and products the teachers use for further learning.
• Reach out to support@urbanintellectuals.com if you have any questions or issues.
• Some links may be affiliate links where we may earn a small commission from purchases.

Sources:

N/A

Queen Yaa Asantewaa

Yaa Asantewaa, the legendary Queen Mother of the Ashanti Empire, led a fierce resistance against British colonial rule in 1900. Her strategies remain relevant for modern resistance movements:

– Psychological Warfare: She used talking drums to instill fear in the enemy and boost morale among her troops. Today, controlling narratives and using media effectively can shape public perception and resistance efforts.

– Siege Tactics: She led the Ashanti forces in blocking British strongholds, cutting off their food and military supplies. Modern movements can use economic and logistical disruptions to weaken oppressive systems.

– Symbolic Leadership: She defended the Golden Stool, the sacred symbol of Ashanti unity. Protecting cultural identity and historical symbols remains crucial in resistance movements.

– Grassroots Mobilization: She rallied her people, challenging Ashanti men to fight for their sovereignty. Today, mobilizing communities and fostering unity is essential for sustained resistance.

– Defensive Infrastructure: Her forces built stockades to block roads and paths, slowing British advances. Modern resistance can use strategic barriers—physical or digital—to protect movements.

Her courage and leadership continue to inspire resistance against oppression. 

King Menelek II

King Menelik II of Ethiopia was a master of strategic resistance, particularly against European colonial forces. His approach offers valuable lessons for modern resistance movements:

– Military Modernization: Menelik II ensured Ethiopia had a well-equipped army by acquiring modern weapons and training. Today, this translates to staying technologically advanced in defense and security.

– Strategic Diplomacy: He played European powers against each other, using their rivalries to Ethiopia’s advantage. Modern movements can leverage international alliances and media to gain support.

– Geographic Advantage: Menelik II used Ethiopia’s rugged terrain to outmaneuver Italian forces in the Battle of Adwa. Understanding and utilizing local environments remains crucial in resistance efforts.

– National Unity: He fostered a strong sense of Ethiopian identity, rallying diverse groups under a common cause. Today, unity and collective action are essential for effective resistance.

– Economic Strength: By maintaining control over Ethiopia’s resources, Menelik II ensured the country’s independence. Modern resistance movements can focus on economic self-sufficiency to reduce external influence.

His victory at Adwa in 1896 remains a powerful example of successful resistance against oppression.

Sultan Samory Toure

Samory Touré, the leader of the Wassoulou Empire, fiercely resisted French colonial expansion in West Africa during the late 19th century. His strategies offer valuable lessons for modern resistance movements:

– Guerrilla Warfare: Touré avoided direct battles when necessary, using mobility and surprise attacks to weaken French forces.

– Strategic Alliances: He sought support from neighboring African kingdoms, though some alliances were unsuccessful.

– Military Innovation: He equipped his army with modern British weapons, adapting to the technological advancements of his enemies.

– Scorched Earth Policy: When forced to retreat, he destroyed resources to slow down French advances, delaying their ability to capture him.

– Cultural & Religious Unity: He used Islam as a unifying force, strengthening his empire’s identity and resistance.

His ability to adapt, mobilize, and resist colonial domination remains relevant today

Pharaoh Taharqa

Pharaoh Taharqa, the Kushite ruler of Egypt’s 25th Dynasty, was known for his resilience against Assyrian invasions and his efforts to strengthen his empire. His strategies offer valuable lessons for modern resistance movements:

– Defensive Fortifications: Taharqa reinforced key cities and temples, ensuring they could withstand external threats.

– Strategic Alliances: He supported Palestine’s resistance against Assyria, demonstrating the power of coalition-building.

– Cultural Preservation: He invested in architecture and religious institutions, using cultural identity as a form of resistance.

– Tactical Retreat & Counterattack: After initial defeats, he regrouped in Upper Egypt and launched counter offensive, showing the importance of adaptability.

His ability to blend military strategy, diplomacy, and cultural resilience remains relevant today.

King Shaka

King Shaka of the Zulu Kingdom was a master of military strategy and leadership. His resistance tactics offer valuable lessons for modern movements:

– Military Innovation: Shaka revolutionized warfare by introducing the iklwa, a short stabbing spear, which made close combat more effective.

– Buffalo Horn Formation: His famous battlefield strategy involved three divisions—the chest (main attack force), the horns (flanking units), and the loins (reserves)—allowing his forces to encircle and crush enemies.

– Rigorous Training & Mobility: Zulu warriors were trained to march up to 50 miles a day barefoot, making them one of the most mobile and resilient fighting forces.

– Psychological Warfare: Shaka instilled discipline and fear in his enemies, ensuring his reputation as a formidable leader 

– Strategic Expansion: He absorbed smaller clans through conquest or alliance, strengthening his rule and influence.

His ability to blend military strength, psychological tactics, and cultural unity remains relevant today. 

The **Deacons for Defense and Justice** were a Black self-defense organization founded in **1964** in **Jonesboro, Louisiana** to protect civil rights activists from violent white supremacist groups like the Klu Klux Klan

### **Key Members**

Some of the notable figures in the organization included:

– **Earnest “Chilly Willy” Thomas** – Co-founder

– **Charles Sims** – Leader of the Bogalusa chapter 

– **A.Z. Young** – Key figure in Bogalusa

– **Robert Hicks** – Leader in Bogalusa, Louisiana

### **Impact**

The Deacons played a crucial role in shifting the civil rights movement’s approach to self-defense. Their armed presence:

– **Protected civil rights activists** from Klan violence

– **Forced federal intervention** in areas where local law enforcement failed to protect Black citizens

– **Helped neutralize Klan intimidation** in Louisiana and beyond

– **Provided security** for major civil rights events, including the **1966 March Against Fear** from Memphis to Jackson, Mississippi.

### **Notable Events**

– **Bogalusa Confrontations (1965)** – The Deacons clashed with the Klan, leading to national attention and federal intervention

– **March Against Fear (1966)** – They provided armed protection for activists marching from Memphis to Jackson .

– **Jonesboro Defense Efforts (1964-1965)** – They successfully deterred Klan violence in their hometown

Their influence declined by **1968**, as Black political participation increased and the Black Power movement gained momentum However, their legacy remains a powerful testament to the necessity of self-defense in the fight for civil rights.

N/A

CLASS OVERVIEW

Learn about how Kings, Pharaohs and Queens used strategies to defeat their enemies and would be oppressors.

BEFORE YOU GET STARTED:

• Please check the materials that go with this lesson and print relevant materials.
• Also, check out the books and products the teachers use for further learning.
• Reach out to support@urbanintellectuals.com if you have any questions or issues.
• Some links may be affiliate links where we may earn a small commission from purchases.

Sources:

N/A

Queen Amanirenas, the warrior queen of Kush, led a fierce resistance against Roman expansion in the 1st century BCE. Her strategies offer valuable lessons for modern resistance movements:

– Strategic Alliances: Amanirenas mobilized her forces and worked with other Kushite leaders to strengthen her army.

– Symbolic Defiance: She famously took the bronze head of Emperor Augustus from a statue and buried it under a temple’s steps—a powerful act of resistance.

– War of Attrition: Rather than direct prolonged battles, she leveraged terrain, climate, and persistent resistance to wear down Roman forces.

– Diplomatic Negotiation: Despite Rome’s military strength, she secured a peace treaty that preserved Kush’s independence without paying tThese tactics—unity, symbolism, endurance, and negotiation—remain relevant for movements resisting oppression today. Which of these strategies do you find most compelling.

King Hannibal of Carthage was a master of unconventional warfare, and his strategies remain relevant for resistance movements today. Here are some key lessons:

– Guerrilla Tactics & Attrition: Hannibal avoided direct confrontation when necessary, using small-scale attacks to weaken his enemies over time

-Psychological Warfare: He deceived opponents by manipulating their expectations—like his famous double envelopment at Cannae, where he lured Roman forces into a trap

– Adaptability & Terrain Advantage: Hannibal used geography to his benefit, such as forcing Roman troops to cross freezing rivers before battle, weakening their effectiveness.

– Strategic Alliances: He sought support from local populations and allied forces, ensuring he had reinforcements and supplies.

These tactics—deception, endurance, adaptability, and coalition-building—can be applied to modern resistance movements.

Queen Nzinga of Ndongo and Matamba was a brilliant strategist who resisted Portuguese colonial rule in the 17th century. Her tactics offer valuable lessons for modern resistance movements:

– Diplomatic Maneuvering: Nzinga negotiated with European powers, using diplomacy to delay invasions and secure resources for her people.

– Guerrilla Warfare: She led her forces in unconventional warfare, using the terrain to her advantage and launching surprise attacks.

– Symbolic Defiance: Nzinga refused to be subjugated, famously sitting on the back of an attendant rather than accepting an inferior seat during negotiations.

– Strategic Alliances: She formed coalitions with neighboring African groups to strengthen her resistance against Portuguese forces.

Her ability to blend diplomacy, military strategy, and psychological warfare remains relevant today. Which of these strategies do you think is most applicable to modern resistance movements?

King Sundiata Keita, the legendary founder of the Mali Empire, offers powerful lessons in resistance and leadership. His strategies remain relevant today:

– Resilience Against Adversity: Sundiata overcame exile and physical challenges before reclaiming his throne, showing the importance of perseverance.

– Coalition Building: He united various Mandinka clans to overthrow the oppressive rule of Sumanguru Kante, emphasizing the strength of alliances.

– Strategic Warfare: Sundiata used superior tactics and knowledge of the terrain to defeat his enemies, proving that preparation and adaptability are key.

– Cultural Identity & Legacy: He established governance based on justice and tradition, ensuring long-term stability. Resistance isn’t just about fighting—it’s about building a lasting foundation.

His story is a testament to unity, strategy, and resilience. Which of these strategies do you think is most relevant today?

King Sunni Ali Ber, the ruler of the Songhai Empire (1464–1492), was known for his military brilliance and strategic governance. His resistance strategies offer valuable lessons for modern movements:

– Military Innovation: Sunni Ali developed a powerful navy on the Niger River, using it to control trade routes and launch surprise attacks.

– Psychological Warfare: He instilled fear in his enemies through swift and decisive action, ensuring his reputation as a formidable leader.

– Strategic Expansion: He conquered key cities like Timbuktu and Djenné, securing economic and political dominance.

– Adaptability: He balanced traditional African beliefs with Islam, maintaining unity among diverse populations.

His ability to blend military strength, psychological tactics, and cultural diplomacy remains relevant today. Which of these strategies do you think is most applicable to modern resistance movements?

No quiz.